BBO Discussion Forums: 55 over pre-empt - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

55 over pre-empt

#1 User is offline   AL78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,168
  • Joined: 2019-October-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SE England
  • Interests:Bridge, hiking, cycling, gardening, weight training

Posted 2026-January-15, 16:21

♠J
♥T5
♦AK963
♣AK786

Club game MPs, red against green.

After two passes, RHO opens a weak 2♥. What do you do?
0

#2 User is online   mw64ahw 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,899
  • Joined: 2021-February-13
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
    Racket sports

Posted 2026-January-15, 16:36

I bid 3♦ taking it to 4♣ over any other bid. This hand should play ok somewhere between 3 & 4 if partner has little.

Or you could swap 3♥ asking for a stopper to both minors as I guess the frequency of the bid would be higher.
0

#3 User is offline   Huibertus 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 454
  • Joined: 2020-June-26

Posted Yesterday, 04:28

You can't afford to pass missing a vulnerable minor suit game if partner has fit and 1 ace.

A dummy good enough for 5♣ for instance


So bid whatever shows minors, whatever shows a two suiter with one of your suits or in case neither option is available 3♦.

Yes it is risky, and it could lead to disaster but you just can't sell out too cheaply.
0

#4 User is offline   AL78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,168
  • Joined: 2019-October-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SE England
  • Interests:Bridge, hiking, cycling, gardening, weight training

Posted Yesterday, 05:01

I bid 3♦, I didn't like it but we had no way of showing a minor two suiter other than maybe 4NT and I didn't think the hand was strong enough for that.



What do you think partner has and what do you do now?
0

#5 User is online   mw64ahw 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,899
  • Joined: 2021-February-13
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
    Racket sports

Posted Yesterday, 05:22

View PostAL78, on 2026-January-16, 05:01, said:

I bid 3♦, I didn't like it but we had no way of showing a minor two suiter other than maybe 4NT and I didn't think the hand was strong enough for that.



What do you think partner has and what do you do now?

I guess he has a limited 6-suiter inviting 4♠. Stick to plan and bid 4♣. This shows the strength bound 55 shape. 4♥ would have been unlimitted.
0

#6 User is offline   AL78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,168
  • Joined: 2019-October-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SE England
  • Interests:Bridge, hiking, cycling, gardening, weight training

Posted Yesterday, 08:47

I was struggling to think of a hand which can bid 3♠ but couldn't open 1♠ or 2♠ and I assumed it was a weak two hand that partner decided was unsuitable for opening second at red, in which case it is a misfit hand and we aren't really going anywhere so I decided to pass. By either luck or judgement I wasn't far off:



This was +140 and a joint top. Several people bid game in spades or NT going down. Someone went two off in 3♠ and one South was allowed to play in 2♥ two down.

Partner said he didn't want to open 3♠ with a four card major on the side.
0

#7 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,927
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted Yesterday, 15:43

View PostAL78, on 2026-January-16, 08:47, said:

Partner said he didn't want to open 3♠ with a four card major on the side.

I also wouldn't open 3♠ with that crappy suit in 2nd seat unfavorable.

#8 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,258
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted Yesterday, 16:45

View Postbarmar, on 2026-January-16, 15:43, said:

I also wouldn't open 3♠ with that crappy suit in 2nd seat unfavorable.

On the contrary I think that an agreement not to open this hand is looking for trouble, even 2nd seat unfavourable and (all the more reason) with a 4 card major side suit.
0

#9 User is online   mw64ahw 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,899
  • Joined: 2021-February-13
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
    Racket sports

Posted Yesterday, 21:44

I would open East's hand, but it's close between 2&3♠ at these colours. Opening 2♠ I would find the ♥s on this hand.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
2 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

  1. Gerardo,
  2. mw64ahw